What do you think?
Hi everyone,
Had a pretty good response from the carbon post and I am glad so many decided to visit the link to learn more! The text of the post has even ended up on an anti nuke site from Oldbury (click here). Glad to see all sides interested in the facts on this one because, as I said, the decision to build new nuclear will be an economic one, not based on out of date, polarised 20th Century views of what nuclear is or could be.
On the subject of “anti” versus “pro” nuclear I would be interested in your comments and views on the subject. I love both sides but I am very obviously “pro”. However, I am absolutely firm on the need to do things right when it comes to nuclear. No ‘corner cutting’, no ‘average employee’, no ’secrecy’ or ‘conflicting priorities’ when it comes to safety. When you have done nuclear for as long as I have you realise that nuclear is, indeed, special. Not only special because of it’s unique properties and hazards, but special for the opportunity it holds to supply our growing energy needs far into this future. I don’t want the industry to screw it up before we start by not staying focussed on what is important.
If you have views, comment them here for everyone to see. Use the ‘KISS’ principal…Keep It Simple, Stupid, please so everyone can understand! No physics speak or boring “what about the waste?” problem statements. If you highlight a problem, try to put forward possible solutions. Respect everyone’s views and most of all…have your say!
Let’s see where it goes.
My sense is that new nuclear will happen, therefore, the opportunity exists for a clear public agenda to be developed, especially on Anglesey. Things like making the new station work for the community as much as it does the company that owns it. Stuff like shaping the islands education system for an engineering economy. You know…forward thinking common sense stuff that the lawyers, accountants and politicians might forget about.
Have a great New Year!
TNG
Hi everyone,
Recent Comments